The feature workspace where your whole team steers one AI.

Many voices. One coherent build.

PM, backend, and frontend bring their intent together into a single agent — building one feature, with a live preview, on top of GitHub. No more copy-pasting context between five disconnected tools.

For software teams of 3–10 · works on top of GitHub · symposium.studio
The problem

A feature has no home

One piece of work is smeared across five tools. Teams spend their day copy-pasting context between them — and the work itself lives nowhere.

💬
Slack
the conversation
📋
Jira
the ticket
🔀
GitHub
the branch & PR
🎥
Zoom
the call
📚
Confluence
the decisions
🔁

The copy-paste tax. Every handoff — PM → engineer → reviewer → tester — is a manual re-entry of context across tools that don't share a unit of work. Nothing is the source of truth; everything is a copy.

Why now

Code got cheap. Alignment didn't.

AI agents collapsed the cost of writing code. The bottleneck moved upstream — to a team agreeing on what to build and steering the agent coherently.

"Agreeing on what to build is the new bottleneck." GitHub Next, framing the "zero alignment" problem — the reason they prototyped a multiplayer coding agent.
5+
features/day a single dev can now ship with agents
5
disconnected tools each feature still passes through
0
shared spaces to plan & steer agents as a team
The solution

Make the feature the unit of work

Symposium gives every feature one home: a thread, a steerable AI agent, and a live preview — with the branch and PR still living in GitHub.

💬

Threaded discussion

Intent, questions, and decisions live on the feature — not scattered across Slack and tickets.

⌨️

One steerable agent

A single AI session per feature that the whole team prompts from their own role.

▶️

Live preview env

Every feature auto-spawns a running environment. Anyone — even non-engineers — can test it from a URL.

Augments GitHub — never replaces it.  Git stays the source of truth for code; Symposium owns the source of truth for intent.

The mechanic

Three roles, one coherent agent

PMframes user value & acceptance
Backendsteers architecture & infra
Frontendsteers UX & visual polish

Each person prompts the agent in their own language. Symposium weaves the concurrent, role-tagged guidance into one instruction the agent acts on. No other shipping tool lets multiple humans steer one agent.

ONEcoherent
build action
How it works

Intent in. Branches out.

Humans and the agent emit events to a log that's the source of truth for intent. A reducer folds role-tagged steering into agent actions; "decided" outcomes materialize into GitHub.

1
👥

Role-tagged steering

PM / backend / frontend prompt one agent on the feature.

2
🗂️

Event-sourced log

Every message & decision is an immutable event — the source of truth for intent.

3
⌨️

Agent acts

The reducer turns decided intent into code in an isolated git worktree.

4
▶️

Live preview

A per-feature environment spins up automatically for anyone to test.

5
🔀

GitHub branch / PR

Decided outcomes materialize as commits, branches, and pull requests.

Two logs, one seam:  Symposium's event log = source of truth for intent.  GitHub = source of truth for code.

Landscape

Everyone owns one slice. Nobody owns the seam.

ToolUnit of workMulti-human steeringPer-feature previewCollapsed comms
Devin / Factory / CodexTask / issue
Cursor / Claude Code (cloud)Task
Copilot / JulesIssue → PR
GitHub Next "Ace" (prototype)Session~
SymposiumFeature

The only one close is a prototype. GitHub Next's "Ace" validates multiplayer prompting — but it doesn't ship, isn't feature-centric, and has no model for resolving conflicting role-scoped instructions. That seam is open.

Why Symposium wins

The moat is alignment, not autonomy

🧩

Instruction arbitration

Turning concurrent, role-scoped, sometimes-conflicting human guidance into one coherent agent action. No product has solved this — it's where our edge lives.

🛡️

Alignment layer, not a model

We never try to out-agent the frontier labs. We compete on team coordination — a product & UX problem they're not solving.

🧱

Feature as a durable object

Competitors treat work as a throwaway task that ends at a PR. A persistent feature accrues context, history, and preview.

🔀

Augments GitHub

Sits on top of your existing workflow. Low friction, no rip-and-replace — the opposite of the plays that have died.

One home for how software gets built.

Symposium starts as the workspace for a single feature. It becomes the place a whole team — and its agents — think, decide, and ship together. Be one of the first teams on it.

No spam. We'll email you when your spot opens — built for teams of 3–10 on GitHub.